What are your reviews for Edupristine FRM Coaching?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
While Edupristine's FRM course offerings may seem impressively packaged with volume of study materials, instructors, and mock tests, the substance unfortunately falls short of developing expertise needed for such a specialized certification. Study modules superficially breeze through advanced valuatRead more
While Edupristine’s FRM course offerings may seem impressively packaged with volume of study materials, instructors, and mock tests, the substance unfortunately falls short of developing expertise needed for such a specialized certification.
Study modules superficially breeze through advanced valuation models and risk assessment scenarios instead of in-depth case derivatives and quantitative analysis – evident knowledge gaps.
The promise of mentoring support from industry expert faculty also rings hollow as trainers display limited insight during clarification of doubts, themselves possibly lacking multi-dimensional command of the subject.
Another persistent feedback from candidates relates to the trivial and repetitive nature of questions in their “1500+ practice set”. Merely testing surface level factual recall, this offers no simulation of actual exam pattern gauging higher order analytical and problem-solving abilities within tight time frames.
Moreover Edupristine’s refusal to augment course rigor despite consistent critical feedback on content and delivery limitations highlights concerning lack of quality commitment for me. An institute serious about FRM success should welcome more exacting student expectations.
See lessI regret my decision of enrolling with Edupristine for FRM Part I preparation seeing the mediocre quality of their content and trainee handling. Considerable gaps evident in their study material’s coverage of essential concepts like credit risk models which were taught too briefly without enough derRead more
I regret my decision of enrolling with Edupristine for FRM Part I preparation seeing the mediocre quality of their content and trainee handling. Considerable gaps evident in their study material’s coverage of essential concepts like credit risk models which were taught too briefly without enough derivation depth. Instructors themselves did not demonstrate strong grasp of modules like machine learning applications in finance to address our technical queries convincingly. Their 1500+ practice questions also disappointed, lacking variety and merely testing superficial knowledge without building analytical and problem-solving aptitude essential for nailing this challenging certification exam. Despite escalations Edupristine refused refund requests for their clearly subpar course. Do not recommend applicants serious about high FRM exam scores fall into the same trap as I did of purchasing this training based on brand name only to inevitably be let down.
See lessWhen I enrolled for Edupristine's FRM Part I course, I had high expectations given their reputation for finance exam prep. However, as I immersed myself in the course, I realized there were concerning gaps. The biggest issue I had was with the quality of faculty and content. Many instructors had onlRead more
When I enrolled for Edupristine’s FRM Part I course, I had high expectations given their reputation for finance exam prep. However, as I immersed myself in the course, I realized there were concerning gaps. The biggest issue I had was with the quality of faculty and content. Many instructors had only textbook knowledge rather than real industry expertise in risk management. Their explanations on advanced topics like machine learning algorithms or credit risk modeling lacked the depth I hoped for as a working professional seeking to upskill.
What made matters worse was that beyond the lectures, there was minimal content of original value. The slides and question banks were summaries scraped straight out of standard prep books available publicly. Where was the value addition for the exorbitant fees I had paid expecting specially designed content by industry experts? Their exam drills too disappointed, barely representative of real test standards, structured to simply recall and regurgitate concepts. The claimed personalized mentorship was also non-existent.
See less