Is Proschool a good choice for FRM?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Faculty seem to possess only theoretical knowledge lacking practical expertise Practice questions non-representative of actual exam standards Feedback on mocks remains generic lacking customized improvement insights Overall quality compromises visible despite premium fees charged Serious commitmentRead more
The volume and branding around ProSchool’s FRM training cannot eclipse feedback around superficial coverage, average instructors and simulated test practices disconnected from real-world exam rigor. For an institute that seeks continued market leadership in this space, investing proactively towards bridging these learning gaps with transparency assumes critical urgency. Present quality issues risk diluting credential credibility downstream.
See lessIt astonishes me how successfully ProSchool has sustained their image of premier FRM coaching institute over decades through plain smart advertising tactics in the absence of substance. They know just the right aspirational buzzwords and name-dropping Ivy League associations to package a mediocre cRead more
It astonishes me how successfully ProSchool has sustained their image of premier FRM coaching institute over decades through plain smart advertising tactics in the absence of substance.
They know just the right aspirational buzzwords and name-dropping Ivy League associations to package a mediocre course as a dream career catalyst without actually empowering real learning.
And by offering discounts coupons, cashbacks and scholarships periodically the institue masterfully keeps their enrollment herd loyal and growing.
See lessAs an FRM exam trainer serving thousands of students annually, ProSchool carries an enormous onus of ensuring well-rounded preparation quality enabling candidates to imbibe this complex subject holistically. However, based on persistent feedback, concerning gaps seem apparent in critical areas underRead more
As an FRM exam trainer serving thousands of students annually, ProSchool carries an enormous onus of ensuring well-rounded preparation quality enabling candidates to imbibe this complex subject holistically. However, based on persistent feedback, concerning gaps seem apparent in critical areas undermining outcome effectiveness for enrolled candidates.
First, the depth in their study material, while voluminous, remains quite surface-level to develop intuitive grasp over advanced theoretical concepts and mathematical models tested. Inadequate coverage of modules like copulas, credit risk analysis using programming, leaves students academically vulnerable during exams. Secondly, while ProSchool touts a strong in-house quant faculty, instructor quality seems inconsistent judging by the inadequate clarification of doubts raised during classes. Lack of modules-specific expertise limits productive discussion. Lastly, over-focus on volumes of practice questions versus variety causes repetitive testing of similar fundamentals often removed from real exam standards.
For an institute of this scale, dedicating higher rigor towards continually enhancing content relevance, instruction quality and simulated test competency development could help ProSchool transform into a true FRM knowledge partner. Presently the experience seems skewed excessively towards driving enrollments at compromised learning expense.
See lessI am extremely disappointed with my experience in ProSchool's FRM Part I course. Despite their tall marketing claims of guaranteed success backed by 300+ hours of video lectures and 5000+ practice questions, their actual course delivery lacks substance or quality control. Their study material is basRead more
I am extremely disappointed with my experience in ProSchool’s FRM Part I course. Despite their tall marketing claims of guaranteed success backed by 300+ hours of video lectures and 5000+ practice questions, their actual course delivery lacks substance or quality control. Their study material is basic at best – several advanced concepts covered in a superficial summarized fashion without intuition or mathematical depth. Attempts to clarify doubts with the assigned faculty have been exhausting in vain – clearly lacking expertise across modules.
The question banks too seem like an afterthought – littered with ambiguous, cluttered MCQs testing nothing beyond textbook theory recall. In no way do these prepare aspirants for the globally benchmarked analytical rigor of the actual FRM exam with its applied focus testing core concepts synthetically. Attending this reputed institute ironically seems to diminish my chances of cracking this notoriously difficult certification program compared to self study. An expensive blunder that has delayed my career progression plans by another lost attempt this year.
See less