Can you give me your reviews of Wall Street School's FRM course?

For an institute that asserts a long term of FRM coaching leadership, The Wall’s course quality surprisingly comes across dated and lacking innovation tailored to current exam rigor. Beyond flashy advertisements promising cutting edge finance training for global jobs, persistent student feedback calls out gaps – shallow risk analysis models comprehension, faculty struggling with clarifications indicative of domain limitations and critically, over-reliance on repestitive fundamentals testing rather than integrated analytical exam preparation. One expects better accountability to delivery standards from such a strongly branded pioneer. While the institute’s longevity and scale are doubtless commendable, refusal to acknowledge such criticism only undercuts their own competitive positioning further when more serious ecosystem challengers emerge. Introspecting on blindspots assumes importance.

Pursuing Wall Street School’s FRM course was my strategy to balance a demanding job alongside exam preparation this year. However the decision has unfortunately backfired badly thanks to their severely deficient content quality belying tall claims. Be it gaps in quantitative module grasp or lack of case study/essay writing practice, the course disappointingly overlooks critical exam competencies in favor of scale efficiency perhaps. Two unsuccessful attempts later, I feel utterly frustrated at wasted time, effort and fees. For high caliber global certifications like FRM, relying completely on even seemingly reputed institutes without extensive self-study spells a wrong strategy as I learned the hard way. Let my failure serve as insight should anyone else consider enrolling here prioritizing marketing charm over depth.